Yum's 8 batches of chicken products qualified to be concealed

The Shanghai Food Safety Commission Office showed all its 11-page inspection documents on the 20th, confirming that the self-inspection of the Yum chicken sample failed the antibiotic residue.

According to the investigation of the office, among the 19 batches of chicken samples of Liuhe Group submitted by Yum! during 2010 and 2011, 8 batches of products had unqualified antibiotic residues, and the test results had already been delivered to Yum!

However, according to the reporter's inspection, whether it is Yum! or KFC, the results of the above-mentioned unqualified tests have never been published on any public occasion.

"We believe that Yum! Group should publish the relevant information responsibly on the basis of facts," Zhai Zuqiang, director of the Shanghai Food Safety Office, told this reporter. "What is clear now is that we have mastered the original eight unqualified inspection reports. All unqualified test reports were also delivered to Yum! from the test at the first instance. For these facts, Yum should admit it.”

The examination report for unqualified antibiotic residues in the above eight batches of products held by reporters was 11 pages in total. The inspection time was from 2010 to 2011. The samples were from Yum! Group and the production unit was Liuhe Group. Eight test reports showed that the sample of raw materials for Liuhe chickens submitted by Yum! includes fin roots, nine chickens, spicy wings, medium and large hamburger thighs, thigh fillets, and wings of grilled wings. Six other products.

Among them, the report of a sample of fin roots from hot peppers submitted by Pythium on August 11, 2010 showed that the furanofuranone metabolite was 14.36 μg/kg, and according to the “veterinary drug in animal foods” issued by the Ministry of Agriculture in 2002 "Residue limit" standard, furanone was identified as "not detectable in animal foods" item.

On October 12th of the same year, Yum submitted a sample of winged midge of winged fins. The test results showed that the two indicators of chloramphenicol and furostanone metabolites were detected. According to the standards of the Ministry of Agriculture, neither of these two items was detected. Should be detected in animal foods. On December 20, chloramphenicol was also detected in nine chicken samples also tested by Yum.

Unacceptable samples of chloramphenicol and furaltatone metabolites were also detected in the mega-hamburger thigh, thigh strips, and wings of the winged mid-tip sample submitted by Yum.

It is understood that chloramphenicol and furanones are antibiotics. The above test reports were all tested by the Shanghai Food and Drug Inspection Institute. The official website stated that it is a technical support agency under the Shanghai Food and Drug Administration.

The Food Safety Office also revealed that after the chicken samples of the above-mentioned Liuhe Group were unsatisfactory after 8 antibiotic residues detected in 2010 and 2011, Yum! had submitted 283 batches of samples in 2012 so far, but none of them From Liuhe, Yum said in its statement on the 18th that until the end of August this year, Yum-Hyun stopped its supplier relationship with Liuhe.

"After unsatisfactory samples were found, Yum should have recalled, destroyed and removed measures in a timely manner, instead of allowing unsafe food to flow into the market," Zu Zhiqiang, director of the Shanghai Food Safety Office, told this reporter, "Shanghai's regulatory authorities will Corresponding laws and regulations to take further supervision and inspection and enforcement actions for Yum!

At the time of writing, KFC did not comment on the above content. "All responses are still based on the statement previously published on its official website." In the statement, KFC still insisted on "setting up multiple checkpoints to ensure food safety."